A court case is in session and it's murder. Or is it?
there's a man/woman who's being accused of murder fur having been seen at the crime afterward.
The man/woman was found to have blood on their hands, so most would jump at the idea that this is proof that the man woman was the murderer. one lawyer says "your honor I thank you for taking a near impossible position between this case as it baffle's some since it's a case which is over 200 years coming.
The suspect is found to have blood on their hands and the witness are split on whether or not the party in question is guilty. Some say that the blood on the man's hands are that of the victim, others will say that it is his own blood or other. But this is not the dark ages of science we do have the ability to find nearly absolute resultes to find the blood as evidence or proof or just bad timing on the part of the suspect. The Prosecuting party has made claims such as these and is known to blow the case open on allogations alone and no real scientific evidence. But recently they've been wining to the contrary with Scientific Probability that leaves no conclusion to their contrary. the prossecuter has never lost a case because it's been unchallenged outside the court and has been found to condescend to the Judge and jury in previous court sessions because their evidence list and their knowledge and the process through which they come to the conclusion has been hard to explain for them that they chose to believe that nobody can understand, a common tactic to win a debate which is laughable to those who have taken the time to evaluate the prosecutur's claims. But they keep winning because nobody challenges them, this changes today.
I have here lab results not only from today's case but previous ones to refute all that this lawyer has represented in the past or at least bring it to doubt. you see your honor we do know through confession and officer testimony that the defendant had blood on their hands but do we truly know who's blood? we do today as I said I have the results. But our prosecution would have you believe that just because it's found consistant with previous cases' not just exclusive to the defendant but other's that this is a closed case and the defendant is guilty in every case. The DNA in which is the reason we are alive today is the determining factor. I know that some here may not be familiar with the word DNA and many may be less understanding how we care so much about such a thing but I tell you it is severely key to this case and previous involving the defendant.
The lab test results for the blood on the defendants hands came back showing 0% of the victim's blood and completely possitive for the defendant's. So you see not only is this evidence Void for being a factor in showing the defendant as being guilty but rather since it is the one real peice of evidence without proof that the prosecution had to help their case I argue that there is no means in which to pin anything on my client.
Your honor I know that you want to close this case early but I will continue to provide evidence that the defendant is innocent and in truth from previous cases' which is what we are truly here about. We are all quick to conclude on the side of guilt because we don't normally care about the details but since this is a court case we must consider any new evidence to shine light on the truth even in past events to show the character's of either side of the crime scene. Your honor since the Prosecuter has won on previous debates on the same accusations or worse in the past. Since the prosecuter has faught for similar cases before I will show that they are not fit for your approval in the past or future. The samples come from similar cases becaues the previous defendants being in similar appearance to the defendant today gives the people more reason to cast blame on hm but rather I have athe results showing NON of the previous cases to be positive for any of the defendants who lost their honor to this opposing party EVOLUTION. because in the past it's been won because the defendant as I said had been found at the scene with blood on their body. But the results I have show that this is only a case for DNA since none of the previous crime scene's involving animals and their breeding and death have any relation to the next scene but the Prosecution would have us believe in serial murder (connected evolved breeding/speciation) but since I have proof here that the evidence the prosecution won with is flaud at best shows that they are not worthy of being given any glory in their history rather with Theory becoming fact it no longer is a theory because they'd have had better evidence. But rather if they base everything soley on DNA and I can disprove their claims then they should be addressed for these crimes against the court and against nature.
The DNA results from the previous cases in which were before time of man show only similarities in the shape and nature of the Perpatrator is going to shock you today. The prosecution originally won only based on similarities and no real science and the court was shamed to call the prosecution trust worthy and allow them to keep their job but only through the complaint of the audiance did the Judge in those cases deem worth the prosecution. But your honor I urge you to not judge based on mass opinion because we know the world isn't flat. But rather judge it on logic, base it on absolute results. if you find me to be wrong then do so but I will know that I represented the truth rather than fabricating and twisting the truth as the prosecution has in the past. Even the best friends of the house in which all these murder's occured is being dismissed as having died or never existed (God/Jesus) but we're not here to debate that we're here for the case of the man being caught red handed and whether or not this and previous cases have a similar conclusion and if that conclusion is based on lies or fact.
The DNA results from previous case's as I mentioned before only shared that there was blood involved and that the perpatrator was similar in appearance. But this would work for the dark ages and since we have science at the level it is today we can prove that that's all it was, similarities. Your honor if I were to tell you that all previous blood from the older cases was found to be distant to non existant in their relation to the accused murderer's and that every case showed that the prosecution claimed at the time that the Perpatrator was always a relative to the last then you'd Laugh at me and them would you not? "remember you have no ties to either evolution or creation here so you can't pre-determin anything based on accusatoins" But this is the game in which the prosecution has played through the centuries. True that the Perpetrator's were always humanoid in form but does this mean they were all related and does this mean that they are all guilty of having some relation to the victim? NO but the voiceterous crowd and prosecution would have you judge based on mass opinion. Hear that the DNA from non of the previous cases was close enough to truly point at the defendants guilt but some came close to within 3% and the oldest cases were too old and decayed to get DNA. But recent studies show that less then 1/4 of 1% of DNA is absured to call true relation between test subjects. But the prosecution would have you believe that being 97% similar in DNA between the blood at the scene accusing and being related to the defendant is absolutely impossible. So the prosecution would have you believe that somehow the last case which is before recorded history is related to the last because of these vast gaps in DNA similarities that it proves anything of guilt. But if I were to explain that someone who has never NEVER been in my family lines had a 99% even similarity to my DNA would that prove anything other than they or I were fortunate to find someone random with similar DNA was a distant cousin that would be hard for chemestry to believe because as I said before less than 1/4 of 1% similarity is astronomically and impssible between NON blood parent results to share a commonality let alone as the prosecution would have you believe 1000's of generations between to share a 99.9 similarity. And they don't they rather omit that fact and have you astonished at the 97% and not explain to you that there's a 2% or larger gap between which in science requires you to have less than 1/4% to be related.
So what was the defendant doing with blood on his hands at the scene of the crime? well he/she confessed that they had a nose bleed before having rushed wildly to the commosion in the same house. But rather than beliving the defendant we'd call foul play and be done with it in the past. But now we have Carbon 14 testing and the like to act as dating measure's and these are all over the table and the prosecution only selected those which helped their case and left out the majority of the results which pointed elsewhere for time of death.
Your honor the only reason the prosecution has a job still is because he's backed up by a Majority of lawyers who play the same game as him and pull the wool over your eyes and the rest of society and don't care about the lie's they teach the next batch of lawyers. To the point that they can only see what they want to see and not the truth before them. But your honor we the rest of the people here and outside these walls hear the loud claims of these lawyers and don't bother learning for themselves of the truth. the proof is that since the evidence presented today and in the past has been found to be shaky at best that the prosecution be removed and the case be opened at a later date after proper study. BTW it wasn't long ago that you had to swear on the god of the bible that the court wasn't lead by lies through witness and evidence. But today we find that these lawyers and their public following have either abolished this right to stand under god or are plotting to. Your honor without the absolute truth we are back in the dark ages.
Pre-history is before confirmable undenyable fact through literature and evidence. anything before history is just that, PRE knowledge. You have to leap with a faith to say anything more than "I believe" which evolution has you do if you believe it. because their closest and most recent relative's to man is PRE-history and they need TIME to prove it took TIME for the differences and mutations to lead to Human's. Yet they dazzle us with a banner of Science because of DNA but Studies show that you can't be related to something outside of your immediate family if it has any more than .001% similarity or less. but the evolution want's you to believe that since we share 97-98% similarities with the best ape candidate that you'd believe the majority rather than the real science "BTW the .001 is an estimate I pulled because I don't remember the exact but it was less than 1/4% to be accepted relation of gene's" But folks majority in science is not everything. To give you some understanding of the 3% gap in gene's. one Single strand of your DNA has Trillions of pieces of information, "that's information that is required to make you, NOT me" and that's +1,000,000,000,000 and more pieces of information to make the human body. and 3% of even 1,000,000,000,000 is still 3,000,000,000 (billion) pieces of inherant information that they want you to believe is similar between you and an ape that they say lived MILLIONS of years ago. But Scientists show that even if you were to be missing less than 9,000 I think it was you'd be of no relation to the person you're matching DNA with. So the Scientists involve MILLIONS of years ago to abscure you to think that its beyond your comprehension and to oppose this means your too stupid. But this is all they really know and they lie about the rest.
think of it this way, if you had 1TRILLION pennies and you were to have a study showing that they all came from the same year. You dash all your pennies in a pile and you start reading every one of them. (mapping the Genome) you'd say yah I'm passed 1,000,000 (million) pennies and all but 300 of them say they were from 1886. Now you already know they didn't all come from the same time that's fine so you set out to prove they all came from the same mint. which needs even less. so you do the same thing never actually appoaching 1Trillion but you keep going with the latest in technology to prove that all the penies came from the same geologic location for the elements that created them. you find that less than 50 per Million are not from the same, but you need less than that to prove that (0%) lol because its ALL. so you have a geologist and a smelter and a prospecter and a Mint press worker all say that it's ok...... sorry Nope you need 100.00000000% to be absolute. This is your DNA were talking about remember. so if your black and a white man comes up and says hey I'm your cousin. and your skin color's are the farthest thing from each other but the DNA comes back 96% are you really going to believe him? I'm sorry but we have Baby DNA tests showing that you need more than 98% or better to be biologically related.
All we know is that Lucy and the lemur found recently DIED we don't know that they had kids and that those kids had mutant's and that those kids had kids etc... we don't know that these bones are not just extinct species of animals (we lose 100's of species completely every year folks). I'll give you and the scientists Millins of years ago or any time before man found out he could chizzle into a wall to make records. you still don't know that these dead things had KIDS. you don't know if LUCY was the last of her kind, You don't know if she was a mutant that she died with her Gene and continued with offspring. All you know is SHE DIED. in 10,000 yrs someone wants to trace a great person or murderer to see if they have living relatives and the only thing you find is bones of them, no records are known of them except their historic deeds, not their personal and lineage. they'd be crazy to say "said bones of the deceased because they have similar features to someone alive today(10,000 yrs from now) show that this person is survived" I'm sorry they wouldn't do that.
that's all for today class Please ask or accuse I guess but be smart and don't fall for what you don't know and say "Millions of years" Adam and Eve didn't live millions of years seperate from the garden and or each other which you conclude if you believe both evolution and the bible.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Saturday, October 9, 2010
View of god's gameset through Chess
I'm sure there's other ways of looking at the way god plays the game of life (it's not a game to him either don't get me wrong here) and this is not the best nor is it the end all, be all of understandings of how he does what he does, but this is how I saw 1 of his passages in the bible.
Take JOB (pronounced Joeb not like the thing you grudgingly go to everyday to bring home a dime) but you Take Job in all his suffering. Read the section where God summons the sons of god and Lucifer tags along "doesn't imply he's a son of god at the time", though he WAS before this, since son of god means angel in loose terms. Lucifer is already cast out and turned into the serpent doomed to wonder the earth the rest of his days on his belly.
Lucifer being brought to attention by the almighty is asked where has he (Satan) been, he confesses or lies we may never know. That he Satan has been walking back and forth, Too and from the earth. (nothing more nothing less)
-JOB 1:7 And the Lord said to Satan "from where do you come?" So Satan answered the lord and said "from going to and fro on the earth, and from walking back and forth on it"
though we should believe he'd been doing something more or he wouldn't be anything more than a lying snake in the garden.
Now here's where the similarities in Chess start to come forth. The Lord our god (even god to the unbeliever for there is only one who without him there would be nothing to exist) The lord our god Calls attention before Satan to look at this man Job who loves him dearly.
Job 1:8 Then the the lord said to Satan, "have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless upright man, one who fears god and shuns evil?"
There is none like him means that nobody at the time living upon the earth came close to the devotion of Job. So then Satan points out what he seams to think is a silly flaw in Job and his blind devotion to god. Now we also get that in order for god to consider asking Satan whether or not he Satan had considered the man Job. this is not a real question for god knows already but rather a question to get Satan to confess as an interigator who has already seen footage of a crime with you in it asks you a question of whether you recognize the severity of what you have done or not. Now it is also understood and believe that Satan is not a single individual party working only to destroy god and oppose him only.... but rather Satan A force not the force that is set upon the earth as an element to tempt us to sin. now consider that Satan is the hammer that Tempers us to see that we should forge or not into a tool for gods puproses. he Satan is asked whether or not he has considered tempting Job or not.
Where in our little game of Chess this goes as far to show that god is on the verge of losing patience "he never actually does btw" and is asking the other player "have you considered this move?" because Satan is avoiding any involvement with gods pieces possibly at the time.
"so Adversary have you considered taking my Rook/Castle?"
Job 1:9 So Satan answered the lord and said "Does Job fear god for nothing?"
Challenging god to find a distasteful fear upon Job that shows terror from him that is known only to poison love and truth, god's love and truth. rather than the fear of a child for their parent which later is rewarded on both ends (or should be) with love and respect. Satan believes "evidence that Satan has not the power of god for he would not have such a question if he knew truthfully without asking Job himself whether Job has an unhealthy fear of Yahweh"
Does this Chess piece of yours serve you only because you have great power and you created it? is what the question would be in the game of chess if the pieces were alive.
Ask yourselves would you create an enchanted chess board if you had the power of giving life? and if so would you expect the pieces to fall in-line to serve you only because you told them that you created them and had the power to take all their happiness away or destroy them? or would you rather the Chess pieces came to terms for love for you on their own without direct influence from you and all the more come back and see all things whither away and die because of their love for you? Or would you have them obey you for fear of destruction?
Job1:10b You have blessed the work of his hands and his possessions have increased in the land.
Satan seams to think that since god has so blessed the land and the works of Job that it is also an isolating curse upon Job, that with the love that Job has in his life with as perfect a life that anybody can come to collect in life at the time Job was also cursed to not having something upon his life that he himself had earned.
if you isolate a babe from disease and misfortune, or cruelty that the child may come to only know you as its life and shun all else. That the child will have been pampered to an extent that it wouldn't know anything else but your love and mistrust anybody else but you. There's a reason why SPOILING the child and sparing the ROD leads to ill mannered children with no respect, or no understanding of why they must respect everybody. Blind obedience may be a respectable virtue it also has a problem with lack of self worth.
Also Satan here shows evidence that Humanism and Evolution is a tool that he favors. He Satan would have the world break away from god and become themselves powerful so that they would be separated from the Shepard and be left to the wolves. He would have humanism show that man needs only himself and his neighbors to fend for themselves and hate everybody else who would stand in the way. Humanism would have man love himself for self righteous means and glorify only himself and those who agree or do better than himself, so that he can learn to adapt the ways of the better man to increase his happiness. Satan's ulterior motive besides being the tempter is either to become god among us himself and do away with Jesus. Or to destroy the earth and start a new with him being the creator of an all new creation. Or to be alone with a wicked self deserving solitude. Or something else that is evil that we can't comprehend today.
Job1:11 "But now stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and he will surely curse You to your face.!"
Satan here Challenges god to use his absolute power to touch the land of Job physically, which would utterly destroy everything not figuratively but literally since god is Love and absolute power.
Chess world would show that Satan is challenging god to either end the game right now by moving the rook outside of its move-set and take the opposing team. or just by clearing the board and cheating. which by having god actually use his hands the pieces he touches would turn to dust.
Job1:12 And the lord said to Satan, "behold, all that he has is in your power; only do not lay a hand on his person," So Satan went out from the presence of the lord.
Here the Lord informs Satan that Satan is promptly unleashed to the lands around Job to do with as he pleases for what every reasons Satan would see fitting to challenge the faith and devotion of Job, and see that Job doesn't remain in favor of god.
In other words I remove my hand from restraining your moves and give you leave to make your move on the board. If satan thinks that Job would sooner defy god if he knew that by evidence god was not with him then Yahweh gave Satan the opportunity to test this by giving the devil several turns to try and Checkmate his king without the protection from Yahweh.
Job 1:13-19 Shows the moves that Satan had arranged either directly or by influence over those who were without god. These are not acts of god truely but rather acts that man would see as by god because they were so precise and destructive. Rather they were results of demonic influence and such. For we know that god did NOT agree he would touch the lands so we have NO conclusion that god is the whirlwind here (later god does appear as a whirlwind but not the same) that destroyed the house or that he is the fire that burned the livestock. Lest we forget that Satan is the great Deciever or do we actually believe or want to believe that god wants to toy with us? I think not
Job1:22 In all this Job did not sin nor charge god with wrong.
Job even in his anger remains a devout servant of god ever solid in his belief and love for god.
In the end here we see that even when Satan has destroyed all gods chess pieces in Job's life Job stand's alone against Satan, the world, and Job's would be friends seen later. All god has is his Rook or king. God stands alone as it were and Satan is left in Check Mate with a full board of pieces on his side still. CHECK MATE.
as a finishing message. Let Jesus take control of your game and deliver you to the endgame and Checkmate without having to kill a single one of the enemies pieces. Invite Jesus into your life because he died for the chance to help you with your game. Jesus is the salvation that we all need.
Take JOB (pronounced Joeb not like the thing you grudgingly go to everyday to bring home a dime) but you Take Job in all his suffering. Read the section where God summons the sons of god and Lucifer tags along "doesn't imply he's a son of god at the time", though he WAS before this, since son of god means angel in loose terms. Lucifer is already cast out and turned into the serpent doomed to wonder the earth the rest of his days on his belly.
Lucifer being brought to attention by the almighty is asked where has he (Satan) been, he confesses or lies we may never know. That he Satan has been walking back and forth, Too and from the earth. (nothing more nothing less)
-JOB 1:7 And the Lord said to Satan "from where do you come?" So Satan answered the lord and said "from going to and fro on the earth, and from walking back and forth on it"
though we should believe he'd been doing something more or he wouldn't be anything more than a lying snake in the garden.
Now here's where the similarities in Chess start to come forth. The Lord our god (even god to the unbeliever for there is only one who without him there would be nothing to exist) The lord our god Calls attention before Satan to look at this man Job who loves him dearly.
Job 1:8 Then the the lord said to Satan, "have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless upright man, one who fears god and shuns evil?"
There is none like him means that nobody at the time living upon the earth came close to the devotion of Job. So then Satan points out what he seams to think is a silly flaw in Job and his blind devotion to god. Now we also get that in order for god to consider asking Satan whether or not he Satan had considered the man Job. this is not a real question for god knows already but rather a question to get Satan to confess as an interigator who has already seen footage of a crime with you in it asks you a question of whether you recognize the severity of what you have done or not. Now it is also understood and believe that Satan is not a single individual party working only to destroy god and oppose him only.... but rather Satan A force not the force that is set upon the earth as an element to tempt us to sin. now consider that Satan is the hammer that Tempers us to see that we should forge or not into a tool for gods puproses. he Satan is asked whether or not he has considered tempting Job or not.
Where in our little game of Chess this goes as far to show that god is on the verge of losing patience "he never actually does btw" and is asking the other player "have you considered this move?" because Satan is avoiding any involvement with gods pieces possibly at the time.
"so Adversary have you considered taking my Rook/Castle?"
Job 1:9 So Satan answered the lord and said "Does Job fear god for nothing?"
Challenging god to find a distasteful fear upon Job that shows terror from him that is known only to poison love and truth, god's love and truth. rather than the fear of a child for their parent which later is rewarded on both ends (or should be) with love and respect. Satan believes "evidence that Satan has not the power of god for he would not have such a question if he knew truthfully without asking Job himself whether Job has an unhealthy fear of Yahweh"
Does this Chess piece of yours serve you only because you have great power and you created it? is what the question would be in the game of chess if the pieces were alive.
Ask yourselves would you create an enchanted chess board if you had the power of giving life? and if so would you expect the pieces to fall in-line to serve you only because you told them that you created them and had the power to take all their happiness away or destroy them? or would you rather the Chess pieces came to terms for love for you on their own without direct influence from you and all the more come back and see all things whither away and die because of their love for you? Or would you have them obey you for fear of destruction?
Job1:10b You have blessed the work of his hands and his possessions have increased in the land.
Satan seams to think that since god has so blessed the land and the works of Job that it is also an isolating curse upon Job, that with the love that Job has in his life with as perfect a life that anybody can come to collect in life at the time Job was also cursed to not having something upon his life that he himself had earned.
if you isolate a babe from disease and misfortune, or cruelty that the child may come to only know you as its life and shun all else. That the child will have been pampered to an extent that it wouldn't know anything else but your love and mistrust anybody else but you. There's a reason why SPOILING the child and sparing the ROD leads to ill mannered children with no respect, or no understanding of why they must respect everybody. Blind obedience may be a respectable virtue it also has a problem with lack of self worth.
Also Satan here shows evidence that Humanism and Evolution is a tool that he favors. He Satan would have the world break away from god and become themselves powerful so that they would be separated from the Shepard and be left to the wolves. He would have humanism show that man needs only himself and his neighbors to fend for themselves and hate everybody else who would stand in the way. Humanism would have man love himself for self righteous means and glorify only himself and those who agree or do better than himself, so that he can learn to adapt the ways of the better man to increase his happiness. Satan's ulterior motive besides being the tempter is either to become god among us himself and do away with Jesus. Or to destroy the earth and start a new with him being the creator of an all new creation. Or to be alone with a wicked self deserving solitude. Or something else that is evil that we can't comprehend today.
Job1:11 "But now stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and he will surely curse You to your face.!"
Satan here Challenges god to use his absolute power to touch the land of Job physically, which would utterly destroy everything not figuratively but literally since god is Love and absolute power.
Chess world would show that Satan is challenging god to either end the game right now by moving the rook outside of its move-set and take the opposing team. or just by clearing the board and cheating. which by having god actually use his hands the pieces he touches would turn to dust.
Job1:12 And the lord said to Satan, "behold, all that he has is in your power; only do not lay a hand on his person," So Satan went out from the presence of the lord.
Here the Lord informs Satan that Satan is promptly unleashed to the lands around Job to do with as he pleases for what every reasons Satan would see fitting to challenge the faith and devotion of Job, and see that Job doesn't remain in favor of god.
In other words I remove my hand from restraining your moves and give you leave to make your move on the board. If satan thinks that Job would sooner defy god if he knew that by evidence god was not with him then Yahweh gave Satan the opportunity to test this by giving the devil several turns to try and Checkmate his king without the protection from Yahweh.
Job 1:13-19 Shows the moves that Satan had arranged either directly or by influence over those who were without god. These are not acts of god truely but rather acts that man would see as by god because they were so precise and destructive. Rather they were results of demonic influence and such. For we know that god did NOT agree he would touch the lands so we have NO conclusion that god is the whirlwind here (later god does appear as a whirlwind but not the same) that destroyed the house or that he is the fire that burned the livestock. Lest we forget that Satan is the great Deciever or do we actually believe or want to believe that god wants to toy with us? I think not
Job1:22 In all this Job did not sin nor charge god with wrong.
Job even in his anger remains a devout servant of god ever solid in his belief and love for god.
In the end here we see that even when Satan has destroyed all gods chess pieces in Job's life Job stand's alone against Satan, the world, and Job's would be friends seen later. All god has is his Rook or king. God stands alone as it were and Satan is left in Check Mate with a full board of pieces on his side still. CHECK MATE.
as a finishing message. Let Jesus take control of your game and deliver you to the endgame and Checkmate without having to kill a single one of the enemies pieces. Invite Jesus into your life because he died for the chance to help you with your game. Jesus is the salvation that we all need.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
christian ignorance's shown on Facebook
the bible is not the word, Jesus is the word and the bible is the history of him, his father and those who changed history because of them. in the beginning was the word "doesn't mean that the bible has existed since Adam was created. This actually means that Yahweh was in part of the Trinity from the beginning "Father, Son, Holy spirit" we just never knew him as Jesus till he was born to Mary. Jesus had been reported with having a light when he entered a room, don't ask me where it says this I was taught it.
for those of you believing that the Bible its self is the light you are partially ignorant to the teaching of Jesus. For this you are saying that someone who's illiterate or blind can NOT know Jesus. No it is because of hearing the Gospel of Jesus and the Witness of what he has done for us or others that makes the blind to see and the lame to walk. The bible is simply confirmation of his works. I've not taken a single class of Ministry college but attending house church with Canada's foremost authority on most all subjects concerning the New Testament sure seams to rub off on ya.
for those of you believing that the Bible its self is the light you are partially ignorant to the teaching of Jesus. For this you are saying that someone who's illiterate or blind can NOT know Jesus. No it is because of hearing the Gospel of Jesus and the Witness of what he has done for us or others that makes the blind to see and the lame to walk. The bible is simply confirmation of his works. I've not taken a single class of Ministry college but attending house church with Canada's foremost authority on most all subjects concerning the New Testament sure seams to rub off on ya.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Old testiment wrath of god
ok people, most of us want to blame god for what he's done to us and our land but you obviously have been misled or are spiritually irresponsible.
Hurricanes Earthquakes etc... are a force of nature and you're correct that he has all control over the weather (he not she). He does not control the weather to demolish, destroy, kill. Not since 2100 years ago or more. He no more does this than you punishing your child and that child breaking a window in spite.
In the time before christ (Jesus not Jehovah) he's been credited to a few confirmed destroyed cities (though scientists just want to give that credit to nature without him) he is still absolute in truth. So before you say he lied or changed his own rules by killing people who you believe may be innocent. consider that these cities were filled with people like the Nazi's every one of them either hating or ignorant to his existance (not ignorant like hearing something and opposing it, rather never hearing something in the first place) and the city being filled with likewise people for a whole generation. now today this would be equal to these Nazis all having knowledge to create and deploy atomic bombs "dramatics I know but I need you to undestand where I'm going with this"
If you were god and you said something Must Never be done and yet there were those who would never stop till those who loved you and abided by your laws were all corrupted or killed, would you not deem this a worthy situation to apply punishment?. some may say NO because they still can't believe that a whole city would be as corrupt and destructive. But were not talking about cities today were talking about civilization 2500 years ago or more where they didn't have the phone or the internet to conference with others Miles away. So these nearly isolated cities would continue to build in power and that power was used to go against the word of god "or rules of the father" and got out of hand.
I believe it is in gods power to over the generations of these cities to make sure all those who loved him were removed. now with all peoples who knew of and loved Jesus "yes Jesus before he was born because he is the word and the word was at the beginning of time and the living word and the word was god" all these people who loved Jesus had left any of these cities, left no doubt that these cities were 100% anti-god. Instead of letting this cancer on earth to spread he'd have to amputate the city from the world. Nothing left to do but to kill.
After all "Do as I say not as I do" comes to mind, but if you want to say "since god/Jesus killed and defied his own law/rules then they're void so they don't apply to me/us" then you are still not living according to righteousness. you are proving you are not capable of becoming better than your original programming.
I myself a year ago pegged the change of actions of god from a vengeful and destructive god to a peaceful one as a mistake and learning process for him. I was wrong, he showed who he is back when he did these things to our ancestors. and in No way are we to think he was wrong in doing so. If he was wrong in doing so then we are to presume that there were good people in those cities. and that they would NOT make the world worse than it is today or just as bad as it is today but at an earlier time. A true and devout christian would understand that it is not in our capability to truly understand his motives except that they are for the overall majority good for all existence. To doubt him is to oppose him or claim he is fake.
You may come out of this thinking "Joe you're wrong for saying this as a christian" but even as a christian you should question all things to know better for yourself and those who may ask. for a wise christian is one who asks all things and comes away with the same or better understanding in light of the previous knowledge and still claim that truth to be absolute. the more we understand about science does not pull us away from god. rather those who have doubts and back it up with science already knew in their hearts they had no god. but to those who use science to back up god are to be praised. "For I am fearfully and wonderful y made" speaks volumes.
some may say that Jesus/Yahweh killed these people because they may have discovered the truth about him, god. I say "your just crying in the woods now, lol like the tree that makes a sound or not when it falls and no body hears it" your just feeding the fire that you don't understand. I pray we never as a whole on earth collectively say we know of no god, for many times when someone says he doesn't exist something in their lives or someone else s lives shows a miracle. The more we explain god by science the more I say "that just shows how much more smarter and powerful he is, not the non existence of him"
for example scientists like to claim that the destruction of Sodom was simply through the impact of a Meteor in the area of Russia where the debris continued on for several hundred miles and hit the city by coincidence. I say that god must have a knowledge of astronomy (lol he created the cosmos so why not?) knocked this meteor out of alignment at exactly the right trajectory, causing it to hit the right spot on earth to cause the Hellfire to destroy the city of Sodom. Anti-christian scientists who talk about this just make it sound like were giving god credit where nature is just random. Where as Christians should look at is as though there's a reason for this and its not just numbers or karma.
The more we as simple humans try to explain something the more we limit it by our own understanding and put titles like "Impossible" on that which we do not accept or understand.
THE END for now I'm sure theres more but I can't think of it for now. Plz comment thanks.
Hurricanes Earthquakes etc... are a force of nature and you're correct that he has all control over the weather (he not she). He does not control the weather to demolish, destroy, kill. Not since 2100 years ago or more. He no more does this than you punishing your child and that child breaking a window in spite.
In the time before christ (Jesus not Jehovah) he's been credited to a few confirmed destroyed cities (though scientists just want to give that credit to nature without him) he is still absolute in truth. So before you say he lied or changed his own rules by killing people who you believe may be innocent. consider that these cities were filled with people like the Nazi's every one of them either hating or ignorant to his existance (not ignorant like hearing something and opposing it, rather never hearing something in the first place) and the city being filled with likewise people for a whole generation. now today this would be equal to these Nazis all having knowledge to create and deploy atomic bombs "dramatics I know but I need you to undestand where I'm going with this"
If you were god and you said something Must Never be done and yet there were those who would never stop till those who loved you and abided by your laws were all corrupted or killed, would you not deem this a worthy situation to apply punishment?. some may say NO because they still can't believe that a whole city would be as corrupt and destructive. But were not talking about cities today were talking about civilization 2500 years ago or more where they didn't have the phone or the internet to conference with others Miles away. So these nearly isolated cities would continue to build in power and that power was used to go against the word of god "or rules of the father" and got out of hand.
I believe it is in gods power to over the generations of these cities to make sure all those who loved him were removed. now with all peoples who knew of and loved Jesus "yes Jesus before he was born because he is the word and the word was at the beginning of time and the living word and the word was god" all these people who loved Jesus had left any of these cities, left no doubt that these cities were 100% anti-god. Instead of letting this cancer on earth to spread he'd have to amputate the city from the world. Nothing left to do but to kill.
After all "Do as I say not as I do" comes to mind, but if you want to say "since god/Jesus killed and defied his own law/rules then they're void so they don't apply to me/us" then you are still not living according to righteousness. you are proving you are not capable of becoming better than your original programming.
I myself a year ago pegged the change of actions of god from a vengeful and destructive god to a peaceful one as a mistake and learning process for him. I was wrong, he showed who he is back when he did these things to our ancestors. and in No way are we to think he was wrong in doing so. If he was wrong in doing so then we are to presume that there were good people in those cities. and that they would NOT make the world worse than it is today or just as bad as it is today but at an earlier time. A true and devout christian would understand that it is not in our capability to truly understand his motives except that they are for the overall majority good for all existence. To doubt him is to oppose him or claim he is fake.
You may come out of this thinking "Joe you're wrong for saying this as a christian" but even as a christian you should question all things to know better for yourself and those who may ask. for a wise christian is one who asks all things and comes away with the same or better understanding in light of the previous knowledge and still claim that truth to be absolute. the more we understand about science does not pull us away from god. rather those who have doubts and back it up with science already knew in their hearts they had no god. but to those who use science to back up god are to be praised. "For I am fearfully and wonderful y made" speaks volumes.
some may say that Jesus/Yahweh killed these people because they may have discovered the truth about him, god. I say "your just crying in the woods now, lol like the tree that makes a sound or not when it falls and no body hears it" your just feeding the fire that you don't understand. I pray we never as a whole on earth collectively say we know of no god, for many times when someone says he doesn't exist something in their lives or someone else s lives shows a miracle. The more we explain god by science the more I say "that just shows how much more smarter and powerful he is, not the non existence of him"
for example scientists like to claim that the destruction of Sodom was simply through the impact of a Meteor in the area of Russia where the debris continued on for several hundred miles and hit the city by coincidence. I say that god must have a knowledge of astronomy (lol he created the cosmos so why not?) knocked this meteor out of alignment at exactly the right trajectory, causing it to hit the right spot on earth to cause the Hellfire to destroy the city of Sodom. Anti-christian scientists who talk about this just make it sound like were giving god credit where nature is just random. Where as Christians should look at is as though there's a reason for this and its not just numbers or karma.
The more we as simple humans try to explain something the more we limit it by our own understanding and put titles like "Impossible" on that which we do not accept or understand.
THE END for now I'm sure theres more but I can't think of it for now. Plz comment thanks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
